Letter to Stalin listing the facts compromising the leadership of the Dagestan ASSR. 1951

A source:

http://sovdoc.rusarchives.ru/#showunit&id=50292

Archive:

RGASPI. F. 558. Op. 11.D. 900.L. 1-17

To comrade STALIN I.V.

Dear Joseph Vissarionovich!

The party entrusted me, a young worker, with the responsible post of chairman of the Council of Ministers of the Dagestan ASSR. It is a great honor to be in such a great government post. There is a great responsibility and serious responsibilities entrusted to me in exercising leadership in the economic and cultural development of such a complex, multinational republic as Dagestan. The greatest difficulties fall on my shoulders in fulfilling the directives of the party and government, in solving the economic and political tasks set before the republic by the party, the government and you personally.

Realizing my full responsibility to the party, government and people, I devote all my strength, knowledge and energy to putting into practice the policy of the party and its decisions, fighting all and all deviations from the party line, from its ideology and politics.

During the short time of my work as chairman of the Council of Ministers of the Dagestan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, I came across numerous facts characterizing the non-partisan behavior of the first secretary of the Dagestan regional party committee, Daniyalov. I became convinced that this is not a matter of accidental mistakes and blunders, but of a wrong line that runs counter to the interests of the cause, the interests of Bolshevik partisanship and adherence to principles, for the sake of parochial, friendly relations.

In December 1950, I informed in detail the secretaries of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b) Cde. Ponomarenko and Suslov in the presence of Danialov himself about the serious mistakes he made in the leadership of the party organization (the text of the information is attached).

Daniyalov not only did not draw any conclusions from this, on the contrary, after that the situation became even more intolerant and abnormal.

Daniyalov, hiding behind an external ostentatious friendship with me, used my posing of these questions in the Central Committee of the CPSU (b) to organize persecution and behind-the-scenes combinations and intrigues. In putting forward questions of principle and vitally important for the party organization, I did not have the necessary support. I didn't have it because Daniyalov, instead of following the instructions of the secretaries of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b), to create healthy relationships and business contact in work, having previously agreed with obedient members of the bureau, upon arrival from Moscow gave me a fight at the b ).

He also had no support because Daniyalov placed personally loyal and obedient people in many leadership positions, and certain leading officials of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, such as Dedov, unrestrainedly support him in everything.

In these extremely difficult conditions for me, I understand the complexity of my position, but I am deeply convinced of the righteousness and have no right to change the party duty, the Bolshevik adherence to principles.

Dear Joseph Vissarionovich!

In that difficult time for the revolutionary movement, when the tsarist guards smashed the workers' organizations and threw the fighters of the revolution in prisons, exile, hard labor by thousands, you strove to create a solid Bolshevik fortress in the person of the party organization of proletarian Baku.

During the Baku period of your revolutionary activity, my father, Mukhtadir Aydinbekov, was your student and gave his whole life for the cause of the party. This is written in the book by L.P. Beria "On the history of Bolshevik organizations in the Transcaucasus" (7th ed., 168 pages), in the book by M.D. Bagirov "From the history of the Bolshevik organization of Baku and Azerbaijan" (2nd ed., 81 pages) and in the Great Soviet Encyclopedia (new edition, volume 1, p. 553).

In my life, I pursue one single goal - to serve the party of Lenin-Stalin as honestly and faithfully as my father served under your leadership, who for his revolutionary activities suffered for many years in exile and prisons and was brutally murdered by counter-revolutionary Musavatists during the establishment of Soviet power in Azerbaijan.

I had to remind you of this because the remnants of those counter-revolutionary and bourgeois-nationalist elements and their descendants in Dagestan seriously hinder me from pursuing the line of the Bolshevik Party, to defend the interests of the state and the people. The situation is complicated by the fact that the first secretary of the regional committee of the CPSU (b) comrade. Daniyalov took the path of patronage and direct support of these dubious elements, admits a deviation from the party line, from its ideological and organizational principles, manifests nationalist hesitations in solving fundamental theoretical and practical issues of the life of the republic, creates an intolerant atmosphere of nepotism, sycophancy and servility, which does not contribute to the deployment Bolshevik criticism and self-criticism in the party organization. The interests of the business are also sacrificed to friendly and parochial relations, and the Bolshevik adherence to principles. Daniyalov has ceased to critically check himself and his work, to understand his own mistakes, admits arrogance, arrogance, complacency. Flaunts his position, loses the confidence that the Party organization has clothed on him.

In the bureau of the regional committee, an environment has not been created for the deployment of criticism and self-criticism. The members of the bureau do not show adherence to principles, mutually hush up the mistakes they know, bearing in mind that Daniyalov takes criticism with hostility.

The situation that has arisen in the leadership of the Dagestan Party organization urgently requires serious intervention by the Central Committee of the CPSU (b). Therefore, I appeal to you with a request to instruct the facts I have outlined to be verified by impeccably honest, politically sharp and principled Bolsheviks who will be able to sort out the state of affairs in the Dagestan party organization before the upcoming regional party conference on June 15.

Chairman of the Council of Ministers

Dagestan ASSR S. AIDINBEKOV.

On the facts of manifestations of nationalist vacillations, serious mistakes and vicious methods of leadership of the first secretary of the Dagestan regional committee of the CPSU (b) Daniyalov.

During my work as chairman of the Council of Ministers of the Dagestan ASSR, I came to the conclusion that the first secretary of the Dagestan regional committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks Daniyalov is pursuing a deeply mistaken anti-party line, which manifests itself, first of all, in nationalist hesitation in solving a number of fundamental theoretical and practical issues, in the imposition of nepotism, sycophancy and servility to the detriment of the Bolshevik adherence to principles and the interests of the cause and the beating of cadres unfit for him.

I also learned that this line of Daniilov is not accidental and refers not only to the last period of his work. It was carried out by him during his work as chairman of the Council of Ministers of the Dagestan ASSR. Daniilov also showed dishonesty and insincerity before the party, hiding a number of serious facts compromising him as a party member and party worker.

In this regard, I consider it necessary to report the following facts. Daniyalov showed serious nationalist vacillations in assessing the movement of Muridism and Shamil after the decision of the Council of Ministers of the Union, which revealed the reactionary essence and bourgeois-nationalist nature of this movement. He reacted very nervously and painfully to the resolutions of the Council of Ministers and the Pravda article and tried to discredit them, collecting materials and documents to refute them. When I raised the question of the need to discuss the materials that appeared in the Pravda newspaper exposing the anti-popular reactionary nature of this movement, he entered into a sharp conflict with me and intimidated me by discussing my behavior at the regional committee bureau. Contrary to my urgent demands, Daniyalov did not allow discussion of this issue at the bureau of the regional committee of the CPSU (b) for two and a half months.

After he was convinced of the hopelessness of his attempts to refute the new attitude and after learning that a meeting of the party activists on this issue would be held in Baku, he was forced to convene a meeting of the city's party activists to discuss the reactionary nature of the murid movement.

Nationalist vacillations also affected the level of the party activists' meeting on this issue. It was held at a low political level and most of the active participants applauded when the Dagestani historian Magomedov, an ardent apologist and author of numerous works on Muridism and Shamil, tried to shift the blame for his mistakes onto a government commission that was considering a textbook on the history of the peoples of the USSR. In this regard, it is characteristic to note two more points. With the appearance of the article in Pravda, Magomedov wrote a statement to the regional committee acknowledging his mistakes and responsibility. Daniyalov, having read this statement, expressed his indignation and declared Magomedov a coward. Therefore, it is no coincidence that Magomedov, who initially realized and repented of his mistakes at the meeting of the asset, began to twist and shift the blame to the government commission.

In his report, Daniyalov concealed his hesitations from the activists and incorrectly informed about the reasons for the delay in considering this issue at the regional committee bureau. When discussing this issue in the order of the results of the asset, I considered it necessary and possible to point out the fluctuations made by Daniyalov in assessing the movement of Muridism and some erroneous provisions of his report.

Daniyalov shows nationalistic vacillations in organizational and practical activities. This affects, first of all, in flirting with socially alien and politically dubious people. At the same time, in order to protect himself from criticism, to pursue his line in resolving major and principled issues, he inflicted reprisals on honest and principled people and placed people personally devoted to him in responsible posts. By means of indulgences and handouts, glossing over and covering up the unworthy transgressions of people compromised and defamed in the past, he put them in a position of dependence on himself. At the same time, people who have the courage to objectively and boldly criticize his shortcomings and wrong behavior, under various pretexts, dismisses them from work, rallies people who are servile to him around him, creates nepotism, sycophancy and servility. instills anti-party morals, kills any initiative of the party activists. As the chairman of the Council of Ministers, Daniyalov pushed bourgeois-nationalist and politically dubious elements into responsible government posts and gives them all kinds of support.

Feodayev Zagidat one time he was sitting as a member of the bourgeois-nationalist organization liquidated in Dagestan. In 1934, when the enemy of the Tomsk people arrived in Dagestan, Feodayev went hunting with him and was surrounded by him. With the assistance of Daniyalov, he was taken by the head of the Road Administration under the Council of Ministers and was a member of the Dagestan government. After moving to the post of first secretary, Daniyalov supported him in every possible way. Feodayev carried out sabotage work in road construction, as a result of which the state suffered damage over one and a half million rubles. In this regard, Feodayev's behavior raised doubts and the commission that checked the work of the Road Administration gave a conclusion that it was impossible to leave Feodayev at this job. I posed a question to Daniyalov about removing him from work. However, regardless of my opinion,

Aliyev Asadulla is a personal friend of Daniyalov and a relative of his wife. He was in prison for communication with bourgeois nationalists. His wife's brother Musaev Khalil fled to Germany in the early years of the revolution, studied with Hitler, a fascist by political convictions. During the war, he served in the North Caucasian National Committee. After his release from prison, with the assistance of Daniyalov, Aliyev Asadulla was appointed deputy. Minister of Agriculture, later chairman of the Andalal District Executive Committee, he was removed from this job as a result of the intervention of the Personnel Department of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks. He currently works as the head of the political department of distant-pasture animal husbandry.

Ali Tamrinsky was once arrested as an active member of a bourgeois-nationalist organization. During the Patriotic War, he conducted sabotage work in a partisan detachment, was captured by the Germans, after a short period of detention under dubious circumstances, he was released by German intelligence agencies. At the request, he came to Dagestan, was appointed director of Dagtorg. Soon he was expelled from the party candidates by the Makhach-Kalinsky city committee of the CPSU (b). Daniyalov long sought to overturn the decision of the city committee and tried to influence the bureau of the regional party committee.

Magomedov R.Back in 1947, Daniyalov knew according to the MGB that Magomedov was a pupil of the enemy of the people, Tahoe-Years. He himself is inclined to be nationalistic, pursuing this line in his books. It was also known that, as the minister of education, he destroyed the work of the ministry, pursued there lines of separation of the Dagestan school from the Russian. After he was dismissed from his job in the ministry, he, being the head of the Dagestan base of the Academy of Sciences, ruined the work of this institution, littered it with socially alien and dubious people, pursued a bourgeois-nationalist line in developing issues of the history of Dagestan, created squabbles in the collective, allowed a rough clamping of criticism , was engaged in economic fouling, had serious office abuse. In the presence of all these remarks and facts, Daniyalov stubbornly obstructed his release from the leadership of the branch of the Academy of Sciences. Even after he was exposed as an ideologist and apologist for Shamil, Daniyalov rejected at the regional committee bureau the question of bringing Magomedov to party responsibility. Daniyalov also took an active part in promoting Magomedov's doctoral dissertation, written by him from a bourgeois-nationalist position and containing numerous theoretical and political errors.

Kazhlaev N. The connection between Daniyalov and N. Kazhlaev, who worked in the Glavneftesbyt of the Ministry of Oil Industry, raises great doubts. Close relatives of Kazhlaev during the establishment of Soviet power in Dagestan were active participants in the counter-revolutionary bourgeois-nationalist Milli Committee party and fought against Soviet power, and after the establishment of Soviet power, they fled to Turkey and carry out work hostile to Soviet power (Magomed Kazhlaev, Badavi, Amentaev, Jamalutdin).

Uncle Kazhlaev during the war years in Kislovodsk opened a restaurant "Dagestan" for the Germans. Another uncle of Kazhlaev lives in Baku, a politically dubious person. In 1950 he came to Makhach-Kala twice, was a guest of Daniyalov. Daniyalov once made a proposal to the bureau to award him the title of Honored Doctor in connection with the 30th anniversary of Dagestan. Daniyalov repeatedly tried to persuade me to agree to approve N. Kazhlaev as my first deputy. Kazhlaev was nominated for leadership positions in Moscow and was admitted to the Kremlin thanks to Daniylov's assistance.

Khashaev T . is a personal friend of Daniyalov, an informant and organizer of behind-the-scenes intrigues and combinations in favor of Daniyalov, a bourgeois-nationalist-minded element who has compromised himself with unworthy behavior and official crimes (I have sent you a special note about Khashaev).

Rustamov T. constantly enjoys the support of Daniyalov. Until 1949 he was an Iranian citizen. His brother worked in the Iranian embassy, ​​located in Makhach-Kala, and carried out espionage work in favor of foreign intelligence. He is currently in Iran and is doing work hostile to the Soviet Union. All this Rustamov concealed when joining the party. In this regard, the Makhach-Kalinsky City Committee dismissed him from his job and expelled him from the ranks of the party. The bureau of the regional committee confirmed this decision, however, at Daniyalov's insistence, this issue was discussed a second time at the bureau of the regional committee, and with my objection it was reinstated in the ranks of the party. Rustamov, it turns out, once studied with Daniyalov and his girlfriend's wife. Friendship in childhood and family ties turned out to be higher than the Bolshevik partisanship and adherence to principles.

Jafarov.By resorting to material services, Daniyalov lost his independence and became dependent on Jafarov. In 1937, Jafarov was arrested for sabotage activities in the Dagvintrest system, as a result of which he inflicted damage to the state in 4 million rubles. In recent years, he, placing swindlers and thieves in financially responsible positions, allowed waste and embezzlement for 7 million rubles. 3 times expelled from the ranks of the CPSU (b), has 4 severe reprimands for misdeeds unworthy of a party member. He divorced his wife, a mountain woman with children, married the sister of the famous enemy of the people Tagiyev, all of whose relatives were repressed by the Soviet authorities. In the presence of all these facts, Daniyalov did not agree with me for a while about the removal of Jafarov from his job as chairman of the Dagpotrebsoyuz. Moreover, with the support of Daniyalov, unbelievable Jafarov took the path of discrediting the government of Dagestan. So, at one of the meetings of the Council of Ministers, during the discussion of his issue, Jafarov expressed his dissatisfaction with the Council of Ministers and defiantly left the meeting, immediately went to Daniyalov with a complaint against me. After my insistent demand, Jafarov was dismissed from his job. However, Daniyalov first made a proposal to approve him as chairman of the Lenin District Council, but not receiving support from my side, after a while, despite my objections, in my absence, Jafarov was approved by the deputy. manager of Dagkonservtrest, and during the year there was no manager. At present, Jafarov is creating fraudulent schemes there. So, in the Blidzhinsky base, he appointed the son of a large kulak, who had just served his sentence (5 years in prison) Abdullayev, as the head.

Magomedov X.- the son of a large tenant, his father had several farm laborers. He hid all this from the party. For a long time he worked as deputy chairman of the Council of Ministers, worked poorly, could not cope. Was sharply criticized in the editorial of the Izvestia newspaper on December 24, 1949. I have repeatedly raised the question to Daniyalov about the removal of Magomedov from the post of deputy. Chairman of the Council of Ministers. However, the release of Magomedov provoked great resistance from Daniyalov and dragged on for more than 2 years. The official idea I made about the release of Magomedov was not submitted to the Bureau for 6 months, persuading me to leave him at work in every possible way. Finally, Magomedov's release came with a scandal at the bureau. With my objection, he was approved by the first secretary of the Levashinsky RK VKP (b) with the motivation to strengthen the leadership,

Nakhushupov comes from a family of large merchants, was expelled from the party twice, in 1937 he was arrested as a member of a bourgeois-nationalist organization, a Trotskyist. However, Daniyalov used him as an assistant all the years of the war, freed him from mobilization into the army, at his insistence he was admitted to the party, subsequently nominated as head of the Council of Ministers Directorate and a member of the government. Daniyalov stubbornly refused to agree to his release, and finally I was forced to make an official presentation, which Daniyalov also did not submit to the bureau's discussion for 5 months. Nakhushupov was released after I raised this issue in the Central Committee of the CPSU (b).

During the war years Kulikov was the chairman of the Kizil-Yurtovoky executive committee and was dismissed from this job, expelled from the party for stealing products from a partisan base. Kulikov submitted an application to leave him in the party in connection with his voluntary departure to the army. However, Daniyalov left him in his office as deputy. manager for the economic part. With his arrival in the regional committee, Daniyalov nominated him as the manager of the Dagestan office of Zagotzerno. Kulikov rendered him great services in building a dacha, supplying the family with food.

A number of other facts could be cited about Danialov's patronage and support of compromised and defamed people (Ragimov - Dagvintrest, Zulpukarov - head of the regional committee department, Guseinov - Dagpotrebsoyuz, Razbitsky - Ministry of Agriculture, Murgalov - Maslorybtrest, etc.). Along with the patronage and support of socially alien and dubious people, Daniyalov pursued a line of beating up honest and loyal cadres who were not obedient to him and not amenable to his influence.

In 1942, in connection with the approach of the front in Dagestan, an extremely difficult situation was created, banditry in the regions took on a massive character. During this period, at the suggestion of L.P. Beria and M.D. Bagirov, by the decision of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b), a group of responsible workers arrived in Dagestan, many of them were indigenous Dagestanis. In leading positions in Dagestan, they honestly and faithfully justified the confidence placed in them by the Central Committee of the CPSU (b). Daniyalov, however, perpetrated reprisals against these cadres, taking the path of their survival from the republic, creating unbearable conditions for them of nervousness and uncertainty. Aliyev, who was then working as the first secretary of the regional committee, went on about Daniyalov, protecting himself from talking that he relied on the brought cadres. These include Comrades. Bagirov M., Akhmedov, Shakhmardanov, Kukhmasov, Agaev, Gildiev and others. The beating went on along the line of personnel from Russian nationality.

Daniyalov showed quarrelsomeness and non-partisan attitude towards Comrades. Yarygin, Matyushin - Upoln. CPC under the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks for Dagestan, Afonin (now secretary of the Tyumen regional committee), Kalininsky (former minister of state security), Tronin (former secretary of the regional committee, now a student of the Academy of Social Sciences), Sayenko (former secretary of the city committee). All these comrades followed a principled line in their work, criticized the wrong behavior and personal shortcomings of Daniyalov. Before the eyes of the activists, Daniyalov became, in a way, a hero in beating up recalcitrant cadres, which inspires fear among the activists and has a deterrent effect on the deployment of criticism in the party organization. A limiting circumstance for the development of criticism is the fact that many non-partisan offenses committed by Danialov, and the facts that discredit him as a party leader, remain unresponsive.

Daniyalov's uncle Alirgamzayev during the years of the civil war led an active struggle against Soviet power. The brother of Daniyalov's wife's mother in 1937 was withdrawn as an anti-Soviet element and died in prison (Zagid Inkov). Another uncle of Daniyalov's wife, Inkov Akhta, had a merchant-kulak economy and several shops in the mountains. Buinaksk, died in the early years of the revolution. The brother of Daniyalov's wife Dibirov Parukh was in captivity with the Germans, at the request of Daniyalov he was released from repatriation, upon his return he lived for a long time at Daniyalov's apartment, after which he went to study in Tbilisi.

In 1949, the wedding of this repatriate took place, where many leading officials went with their wives, including the second secretary of the regional committee Shestakov, who bruised his leg and lay for a long time after that.

At Daniyalov's apartment, under mysterious circumstances, the sister of Daniyalov's wife committed suicide. There are different assumptions on this score. Some say she got pregnant from Daniyalov, while others say that she knew too much about Daniyalov's dark deeds during the war. Another sister soon died no less mysteriously. She fell ill, but instead of being treated, she was sent to the area where she died.

During the war years, Daniyalov's wife was engaged in defeatist conversations and this was the subject of discussion in the regional committee. She has a very great influence on Daniyalov, keeps him in tenacious hands, is aware of party secrets, in fact dictates the line of the regional committee, especially in matters related to the placement of personnel. Unceremoniously interferes in the affairs of the regional committee and the Council of Ministers. Spins among the wives of socially alien and dubious persons.

In 1947-1948. some leading workers allowed petty-bourgeois manifestations, engaging in economic fouling and building dachas. Some of them were punished, and Daniyalov, who spent 300 thousand, managed to hide it from the CPC under the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks. He also hid the fact that he financed the construction of all summer cottages and allowed illegal expenses in the amount of about 2 million rubles.

The behavior of brother Daniyalov is completely intolerant. In 1945, being the secretary of the Gunib RK VKP (b), he beat the head of the RO of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Abasov. As chairman of the executive committee of the Khunzakh region, he cohabited with the wife of a front-line soldier, had a child. In order to better arrange for his brother, at Daniyalov's insistence, the regional committee made two erroneous decisions. The first - the release of Habibov - upolminzag and the approval of Daniyalov's brother for this position, the second - the release of Hasanov - the deputy. Minister of Internal Affairs and the approval of brother Daniyalov. Both decisions were overturned after the intervention of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks following complaints from Hasanov and Habibov. Daniyalov's brother actively intervenes in the affairs of the regional committee, behaves like the second secretary of the regional committee.

The selection and placement of personnel is carried out not for political and business reasons, but guided mainly by friendly and friendly considerations. As a result, an intolerable atmosphere of sycophancy, servility and mutual responsibility has developed, which does not contribute to the development of criticism and self-criticism. This affected, first of all, the regional committee bureau. The bureau has not created an environment for criticism, the bureau members do not show adherence to principles and do not correct Daniyalov's mistakes, knowing that he shows an intolerant attitude towards criticism. Imagining himself to be independent of the Party organization, which has clothed him with confidence, he boasts of his position, shows arrogance, arrogance and complacency. I stopped critically checking myself and my work, and I stopped looking into my own mistakes.

The role of the regional committee bureau as an organ of political leadership was downgraded, because Daniyalov was able to smuggle into the bureau personally sold to him, obediently obedient people (Shamkhalov, Majidov, Magomedov, D. Guguchia).

Shamkhalov , as it turned out, being the head of the fuel industry department, appropriated 12 thousand rubles of state funds, and Daniyalov showed generosity at the expense of the state, illegally writing off this amount. Being the head. industrial department of the regional committee, Shamkhalov took part in booze organized by the former minister of the food industry Kalbanovskaya, who, taking advantage of Damkhalov's connivance, allowed a huge embezzlement and squandering of state. alcohol, for which this woman was sentenced to 10 years in prison. Shamkhalov is financially connected with Jafarov and Rahimov, shields these unsuitable business executives and stands in their defense.

Majidov , being the Minister of Education, ruined this work, littered the apparatus with alien, dubious people. During the war, deputy. Daniyalova appropriated Chechen property. Once he studied with Daniyalov, is personally devoted to him, behaves in front of him like an obedient child. At the suggestion of Mejidov, Karachiev and Isaev were nominated to the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, having serious remarks and unworthy of such a high honor.

To secure himself a strong position and support from the Minister of State Security, a member of the regional committee of the Guguchiya committee, Daniyalov covers up and covers up the serious mistakes and abuses committed by Guguchi.

Daniyalov knew that in the summer of 1949, in the presence of MGB officer Sharifov, Guguchia had committed methods alien to Soviet intelligence in relation to one prisoner, beat him and knocked out his teeth in order to get the testimony he liked. Sharifov was soon dismissed from his job for giving a truthful testimony on the matter.

Daniyalov also knew that at the meetings of the Council of Ministers, and at the bureau of the regional committee, he showed tactlessness, rudeness, reaching the point of malicious and unfounded attacks and intimidation of members of the government. For example, the former minister of the food industry and before. In the presence of everyone, he accused the city executive committee of Khrutsky of sabotage, and declared a member of the bureau, Markarian, a squabbler and a scammer. He has mastered a lordly disdainful attitude towards meetings of the Council of Ministers, often absent without permission and good reason. When approving nomenklatura workers, he ignores the materials available on them, and presents them whenever he wants. So for example, for deputy. Chairman of the Council of Ministers Taimurazov and chief of the building materials department Omarov presented incriminating materials after 5 months after their approval in the Central Committee of the CPSU (b).

Daniyalov knows such a mocking attitude of Guguchia towards his employees, on the basis of the quarrelsomeness of removing three deputies by him - Mezrugel, Kozhevnikov, Gniloshupov, who revealed Guguchiy's serious mistakes, dismissing the leading personnel of the ministry - Aziev, Aliyev, Medzhidov, etc., facts of clamping down on criticism in ministry. Daniilov tacitly blesses all this only because Guguchia supports him in all other matters. It is known that Daniilov uses Guguchiya to collect materials on the compromise of people unfit for him (Aliyev, Fataliev, Sultanakhmedov, etc.). At the same time, he smears materials on people close to Daniyalov and on the relatives of Daniyalov himself (Khashaev, Magomedov Kh. Zulfugarov and others). The activists are outraged by the fact that Daniilov and Guguchiya, under the guise of hunting, often take pleasure walks, accompanied by joint drinks.

The situation is aggravated by the fact that the second secretary of the regional committee, Shestakov, does not follow a principled line in his work, does not have his own person, in all servile ways he pleases Daniyalov and his entourage, hush up the mistakes known to him. Shestakov once boasted that he worked with Rodionov (the former chairman of the Council of Ministers of the RSFSR), he almost recommended him to the party.

Due to all these circumstances, there is no criticism in the bureau, and Daniyalov, having the majority of bureau members obedient to him, pursues his own line in resolving issues of principle. Daniyalov also pursues an incorrect, parochial and nationalist line in resolving issues of economic and cultural development (distribution of pastures, construction of new facilities, etc.).

In this regard, the following facts are characteristic: When he was running around with the project of the Avar Autonomous Republic, when distributing the former Chechen regions, he tried to resettle only Avars and partly Dargins, he liquidated the Lak ped. school and organized the second Avar ped. school. When distributing the lands of the stud farm, he insisted that 600 hectares be allocated to the collective farm. Chapaev, where he was born, and the Chokh collective farm (the native village of Daniyalov's wife) occupies more than three districts, there are also a number of other facts.

In the methods of leadership, the ostentatious side prevails, more an administrator than an organizer and political leader. Allows depersonalization and substitution of the Council of Ministers, regarding the manifestation of the slightest independence as a departure from party control and opposition to the regional committee, which leads to diminishing the role and responsibility of Soviet and economic bodies in solving economic and political problems facing the republic. Elements of guardianship are being reborn into unacceptable methods of furnishing the leadership of the Council of Ministers with people who are ready to constantly inform him about my actions. A low role is played in this respect by my deputy, his childhood friend Arbuliev. Collegiality in the work of the bureau is trampled on, many issues of the life of the republic are resolved individually, without consulting and not taking into account the opinion of my and other members of the bureau (creation of new districts, letter from Comrade

When discussing a number of fundamental issues, when I began to express my opinion, Daniyalov made rude and unreasonable attacks, reaching the level of insult. So, in the presence of the secretary of the regional committee Alikber and scientific workers Magomedov, Emirov and Nazarevich he expressed himself at my address: "Go to hell."

In the presence of members of the bureau of the regional committee on the basis of disagreements on the issue of assigning a pension to the old party member Amirov, he went beyond what was permitted, got up and frightened me with an ink set. Danialov's rudeness, tactlessness, arrogance and arrogance do not know the limit, he often loses the ability to calmly, objectively and thoughtfully look at things, behaves extremely impartially and tendentiously towards persons who are not obedient to him, and will certainly find a way out to get rid of them. Where there is a lack of facts, arguments, backstage intrigues and low-standard combinations come to his rescue in order to create a certain opinion. By resorting to anti-party methods and methods, breaking party and Soviet laws, instilling fear and fear among the activists, rallying around him personally loyal people, he created a princely position in the republic.

Spraying on trifles, often dealing with issues related to the functions of Soviet organizations, it misses the main tasks and does not focus the Party organization's attention on resolving the key and decisive issues of the republic's economy.

The Dagestan Republic has a serious lag in the development of agriculture. A significant number of collective farms receive low incomes from year to year, and give the collective farmers little bread and money for workdays. So in 1948, 63 collective farms, in 1949 - 54, in 1950 - 23 collective farms did not receive bread for workdays. In 1948, 175, in 1949 - 278 and 1950, 244 collective farms did not give money for workdays. Little funds are allocated for the indivisible funds of collective farms, and the social economy of collective farms is developing poorly.

Instead of concentrating all efforts on eliminating such a serious lag in agriculture, Daniilov constantly diverts his attention to resolving prestigious issues, intrigues, behind the scenes and behind the scenes conversations, creating a whole circle of people involved in these matters.

The created intolerant situation has an extremely negative effect on the state of affairs in the republic and can lead to fraught consequences. In this regard, serious intervention of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b) is urgently needed.

Daniyalov, working for a long time as chairman of the Council of Ministers and secretary of the regional committee, placed people personally loyal to him in many responsible posts, flirts with national feelings, has extensive experience in beating honest and loyal people, but not obedient to him, and has the ability to get away from any responsibility. Therefore, it is extremely difficult to find out the true state of affairs.

In view of this, I would consider it necessary for the Central Committee of the CPSU (b) to request the opinion of the former members of the regional committee bureau who previously worked with Danialov and are now outside the republic (I mean bureau members who have not compromised themselves, and preferably from among Russian comrades).

The leaders of the Bolshevik Party, Lenin and Stalin, teach that a policy of principle is the only correct policy. Agreements and compromises are unacceptable in resolving fundamental issues. Principles are not reconciled, they are victorious.

The questions I have outlined are not questions of a personal nature and do not arise from personal disagreements and relationships with Daniyalov, but are questions of a fundamental nature related to the life of the Party organization as a whole.

I am deeply convinced of the righteousness, and therefore, despite the complexity of the situation and regardless of the fact that I have no support from the bureau members, I decided not to betray my party duty - the Bolshevik adherence to principles.

I would also consider it necessary that the workers of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), already misled by Daniyalov, who have a preconceived opinion about the situation in Dagestan, should not be involved in checking these facts.

Chairman of the Council of Ministers and member of the Bureau

Dagestan Regional Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks S.M. Aydinbekov

05.24.1951