Afghanistan, Media propaganda and Left tail-gating - a discussion

Afghan question and approach to it has become a defining line between Marxism Leninism and revisionism, reformism, between the idealist abstract mechanical approach and the concrete dialectical approach. Outlined questions and most likely additional questions added by the group members are being discussed by a group of international Marxist Leninist (Stalinists) from the point of view of Marxism Leninism. 

Any objective comments, concrete facts and assessments on any outlined questions are welcomed - thru open "comment" or privately thru "contact" on the blog.

In our opinion, the question is complicated (more like due to media and confusion among the left turned to be a complicated one) in appearance, but as far as the fundamental principles of Marxism Leninism is concerned it is elementary which will be the main focus of  our discussion.

Initial outlined questions; 

What happens when the Mainstream Corporate media becomes the "champion of feminism"?  What would that mean?

First question to respond would be if this "feminism " is in "general " or in "Afghanistan particular"? 

Obviously, it will follow the question of why not in Libya particular where women are being sold as slave or other so many countries as bad as Afghanistan.

Second question would be; " why the "Left " is tailgating the corporate media's "feminism!!"? 

Is it because they agree with them? some definitely do agree.

Is it because they cannot come up with a viable, concrete solution to Afghanistan situation? 

Maybe, they cannot come up with an external solution because it is a question of self-determination, not a question of imposing one's will and culture to the people of another country.

Is it possible that the corporate media's "feminism!!" is being used to justify the previous occupation, and ratify the future military intervention, and prepare the grounds for consent? 

Is it possible, at the same time, that they are manufacturing and reinforcing an understanding that;

"it is the west's duty and responsibility to bring "civilization to the East and South by any means necessary". 

Is it possible that they are trying to make people forget that in most cases the women rights in those countries have been diminished and gotten worse because of the direct invasions or proxy wars of West?

Has anyone seen any "solution" been presented in any "leftist" article other than echoing the corporate media and "women rights" concerns? 

Isn't, not presenting a "solution" and only echoing the same -media propaganda- tantamount to the tacit acceptance of the solution -intervention by "civilized" west- given by the corporate media?

Does the woman- LGBT concern represent the only and fundamental question of what the Afghanistan is facing now? 

Do the "feminists" brought up to the corporate media for interview, actually represent the "women of Afghanistan"? 

Is there a possibility that the Taliban won so quickly because; the Afghan people in general, and those -who were raped and sold during the occupation - Afghan women in particular fed up with the occupation and disruption of their lives, inactively supported Taliban? 

Is there a possibility that the corruption, inequality of the puppet US government, and the raids, shootings, rapes, humiliations by the occupying forces played an important role in not going against Taliban but preferred an "end to occupation"? 

Is it possible that the "state of mind" of Afghan people will be different then the "state of mind" of people drinking beer or sipping scotch in a western bar and discussing on an issue related to Afghanistan? 

Finally, is there a possibility that an aggressive imperialism with a history of destruction and plunder can be considered "better" than any reactionary local government? (The direction of which some left is heading, and thus tacitly supporting military invasions in latter countries)  

For those left-phrased reformists and liberals, looks like It's about time "to spill the beans."