On the latest Russian missile attack and its implications
When the perspectives derived from fantasy and myths of 1990s era are considered to be still the "realities" of the new era, the risks of catastrophic consequences of their action becomes inevitable.
The hypocrisy of so called "green light" given to Ukraine to "hit" deep in Russia has become another action of the Neo-Cons that backfired. This time it back-fired to to a degree that cornered them; to either escalate the situation or grasp the fact that the escalation could bring about the end of Europe, especially that of British and French.
The hypocrisy is that the "green light" is not for the Ukraine to use but for themselves since Ukrainians do not have the technology and expertise to use these missiles. Entire process of firing these missiles, depending on the type, has to be done by the US, British or French military personal. In other words, the firing is not and cannot be done by Ukrainians. It can only be carried out by the Western experts. However, Main Stream Media concealed this fact with headlines "Ukraine fired US made missiles to Russia".
Aside from the fact that the missile strikes were mostly shot down by the Russian and have no significant value as far as the inevitable consequences of this war is concerned; the action of the West forced Russia to give a final warning to those who are living in the past with their fantasies and wishful thinking.
Russia has struck a well-known missile factory in Dnieper with a new ICBM that is capable of carrying multiple nuclear war heads. The destructive affects of the missile without any nuclear or otherwise heads is frightening. What is more frightening for the neo-cons of the West is that the speed of the missile that scientifically impossible to detect and stop.
What is more significant is that , according to the verified news, Russia issued a warning to the US 30 minutes before the launch. With a 10 to 15 minutes flight time , US and West had 45 minutes to stop the missile and yet they couldn't. All the credible experts, including MIT professor, pointed out that it is impossible to stop this missile. Somehow confidently confirming this Putin said; "Russia would issue advance warnings if it launches more strikes with the Oreshnik (missile) against Ukraine to allow civilians to evacuate to safety". He added; “In the event of an escalation of aggressive actions, we will respond decisively and "in kind"... Western leaders who are hatching plans to use their forces against Moscow should “seriously think about this.”
The use of this new missile is a serious warning to the West and looks like a final message, a signal telling that "this hypersonic missile could have been tipped with multiple nuclear weapons", it would be tipped as such against you."
This is a serious, game changing warning which easily can bring about a change in the attitude of the US Neo-Cons. Anyone who believes that in the case of a tactical nuclear weapon used by Russia as a response to the British and/or French aggressiveness automatically will bring the US in the nuclear conflict is living in a fantasy land. There is no country or region that is not expendable for the US when it comes to their interests and safety. It is true that these two months will be a month of provocations and aggressiveness to set the "scape goat" Trump up for the failure. However, it is highly unlikely that US will let itself fall into a "nuclear war" situation with Russia, for which automatically means against China and North Korea.
One of the war criminal of all time, Henry Kissinger once said,; “It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal.” America will not hesitate to "cut and run" when it fits its interests.
As the latest missile attack proves the fact that Russia does not have to use any nuclear weapon against Ukraine or against a European country - or even against NATO since it is not really a functioning unitary military organization with any significant power anymore. The missiles and bombs of Russia in quantity will and can bring a similar destruction of a tactical nuclear weapon without the side effects of a nuclear warhead. US is aware of this fact, so does anyone with extensive military knowledge.
According to the nuclear policy of Russia, the only way Russia would use a nuclear weapon would be against a nuclear attack. The article related to the use of it when it is an existential question is not applicable because no united power of the West has the military men power to invade Russia on land in order to cause an existential question- in the final analysis, wars are won on land.
No wars can be won without the economic power and economic stability to support a long war. Europe is in economic crises with depleted military arsenal. European people at large against the war, especially to a war against Russia.
The old "perspectives" about the world and balance of powers shaped the minds for years have become a thing of the past. The fantasies, myths and wishful thinking about the world and world events do not reflect the realities of the "new world" . It is time to sobber up and get rid off the "old perspectives" based on the myths of "old', and try to grasp the realities of the "new world" in order to shape new "perspectives" based on realities.
Erdogan A
November 22,2024
Thailand
Update
November 25, 2024
A "new world" with game changing "new weapons."
Will the US impose a "private" gag order to Professor Ted Postol in relation to his assessments about the latest missile.?
In the article "likelihood of a Nuclear war" which I said that " I do not see any likelihood of nuclear world war, I had stated that;
"Nuclear warheads will probably remain for a long time as a weapon of deterrence, new missiles will be produced for their possible use. It is similar to the fact that wars will be inevitable as long as capitalism exists. New technological weapons will continue to be destructive in the service and for the benefit of Military Industrial complex and of the Finance Capital. However, most likely the wars will be proxy wars with the use of new weapons at the expense of the people and the destruction of the proxy countries in where the new “technological weapons” will be tested on the field and improved accordingly."
If the assessment of the new weapon is correct, the latest test of the Russian Hypersonic Glide Missile in Ukraine's' Dnieper confirms my argument. Although it is being argued that China already has recently developed this type of missile and has in its arsenal, its first time use by Russians shocked the world military establishments and Western Governments.
As the preliminary assessment of one of the few reliable authority in military scientist from the West, Professor Ted Postol, ridiculing the Western counter narratives, stated that with the current military scientific technology it is scientifically impossible to stop this missile. He reiterates the fact that he is still in the middle of acquiring data on the missile and may revise his complete assessment in detail, he is sure on his statement that it is impossible to stop this missile. We will wait and see what his final conclusion is unless a gag order is imposed on him related to the subject.
What does this mean as far as the conventional war is concerned?
It means that Russia can hit any part of the Europe, including England without any problem with devastating affects. It means that all those Aircraft Carriers, huge warships (especially in the case of South East Asia) will have no significance but will be sitting-ducks on the surface of water ready to be destroyed. All the "military bases" of the US in these regions will be an easy target for Russia and China. A game changing development. A drastic change in the military balance of powers in world scale because the stated fact that the US does not have this type of missiles in its arsenal yet, and it will take some time for the US to develop and put in the production.
As far as the war in Ukraine is concerned Russia is already winning the war and this test has proven the fact that they do not have to use nuclear weapon to reach their final goal. NATO with its dismantling, weak and disunited structure did not present a decisive danger for Russia, and after this test, they will have to think twice to take any provocative action to escalate the war.
The real message with this missile test is to the US; to the Neo-Con hawks. In factuality, this message is to both factions of Neo-Cons; Russia-phobia and China-phobia factions. If China already has these missiles in its arsenal as stated ( not by China) but by Western military experts, the US adventures thousands of miles away, in South China Sea and Taiwan will most likely be slowed down.
Everyone is anxious about the two-month period before Trump's inauguration. For some are now fearful, others are hopeful after the test of this 'new weapon", thinking that this development will restrain the Neo-Con "hawks" from further provocations. The perspectives are relative to the ideological makeup of the commentators. For us, it really does not matter whether it is Trump or Harris or anyone else, the real decision makers behind them always will be the existing and new unelected military-civil bureaucratic structure in the service of finance capital and military industrial complex.
We shall wait and see.
.jpg)
No comments